i think the fact that the car is cheaper than supercars yet beats many of them isnt gonna make someone go out and buy one... unless they're in it for the status, the way supercar buyers are, there really is no point in spending that much...
Um... I believe the fact that the car is less expensive but viciously faster than most others is ALL the reason why someone would buy it. What other reasons are there? It's the same reason why I bought my car, so I can have something that can keep up (and beat) cars much more expensive for only a fraction of the admission price. So why would there be no point in spending "that much" ($70-80k) compared to spending double or triple that on another car with less performance but a big name? To some people, it's worth it.
with 68k you could buy a loaded 3 and maybe a 5 series beemer... if you dont need that kinda performance from a car, then why buy it? i think its really just for those that want to just beat someone in a 0-60 on the street which is dangerous, or for those that actually take their cars out to the track and race them head against the porsches and ferraris... or it could be used as a car to drive around in, but it wont be much fun... similar to the z06, although the vette is an american car and the pride of american cars and what with all the slogans saying to "buy american" i think the z06 would probably slide by... the gt-r probably wont...
I beg to differ. You can't really make that argument about being able to buy two different cars for the same price, since you could say that about anything... that's like saying why would somebody buy a Bugatti Veyron, when you could get a Ferrari F430 and a family hauler (Benz or something) and a house for the same price. Besides, $68k will NOT get you a loaded 3-Series (assuming it's not the M3, a 335i can get close to the $50k range) and a 5-Series. Far from it.
Anyway, while drivers don't always exploit the full potential of their cars, some do. And I think car enthusiasts in America would have more of a reason to look into a GT-R than a Z06... American pride aside, the GT-R is already looking like it will dominate the Nurburgring, as it has already unofficially eclipsed the Z06 and the GT2, plus I can guarantee that it will be a FAR more comfortable daily driver. Plus I think anyone could enjoy it, as the AWD will definitely help in the rain, plus for people who live in snowy areas could ideally use it with snow tires.
BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY... it is most definitely a supercar in terms of the performance it generates. But on top of that, it will be MUCH more practical than anything it competes with. People who have the funds for Ferraris, Lamborghinis and Maseratis typically have several other toys in their garage. While some of these people are also potential GT-R customers, the GT-R customer base will also include more "regular" people who don't have massive bank accounts, so more than likely this will be their main car. The reason why I bring this up is because it is a known fact that a lot of the supercars, particularly the Italian exotics, aren't meant to be daily driven on a regular basis for the morning and afternoon commute. Even Maserati has admitted that their older cars tended to have noticeable reliability issues at less than 10k miles, but since drivers today are driving their sports cars more frequently, they've been re-engineering their cars to make it to 30k miles, hopefully trouble-free. But I BET the GT-R will be the truly daily-driven supercar that you could use for your commute with reasonable comfort and tack on 15k miles a year with no issues. Not that the maintenance on it will be cheap, but rest assured it will be much more economical than owning a Ferrari but with all of the speed and then some.
It will truly be an amazing car, I really cannot wait.