What the FUCK

keco52

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#1
A man parked his truck on a country road outside Turlock on Saturday night, removed a baby boy from a car seat and then beat the child to death in the street, fighting off passers-by who tried to stop him, until he was gunned down by a police officer whose helicopter landed in a nearby pasture, police said Sunday.

The 27-year-old suspect, who lived in Turlock (Stanislaus County), died almost immediately where he fell. The child, who according to police appeared to be 12 to 24 months old, was taken to a hospital but died before arrival.

Police officials declined to identify the man and said they were not yet certain who the child was - or in what way, if any, he was related to his attacker. The Stanislaus County coroner's office told police that the agency may have to identify the boy through a DNA test because he was beaten beyond recognition.

No information was immediately available about the child's mother.

The suspect "had tunnel vision," said Stanislaus County sheriff's Deputy Royjindar Singh, a department spokesman. "As people tried to intervene, to tackle him, he just went back to what he was doing. Anything and everything he could do to the baby, that's what he was doing."

Singh said investigators were working hard to answer a series of questions about the shocking case, including why the suspect stopped in the roadway, where he was coming from and where he was going. Singh said he did not know whether the suspect was under the influence of alcohol or drugs.

The beating and subsequent shooting by police happened near a dairy ranch along two-lane West Bradbury Road, between South Blaker Road and South Central Avenue, in an unincorporated area about 10 miles west of downtown Turlock and 20 miles south of Modesto. The rural road, which extends straight west from Highway 99, has no streetlights.

Singh said an elderly couple driving along West Bradbury Road just after 10 p.m. made the first 911 call to police, reporting that the suspect's four-door Toyota pickup truck was parked facing west in the eastbound lane. According to the caller, the suspect was behind the truck, where he was brutally beating the boy.

The couple had poor cell phone reception and did not give authorities a precise address, delaying the response by a few minutes, Singh said. But soon, he said, others called as well, and some witnesses stopped and tried to halt the attack on the child, who was shaken, punched, kicked and stomped on the pavement.

"One (person) tried to intervene, and the suspect pushed him off and continued assaulting the baby," Singh said.

By 10:13 p.m., a county dispatcher had confirmed the correct location and broadcast it, Singh said, but it was so remote that the first officers to arrive were aboard a Sheriff's Department helicopter that had been patrolling over Turlock. The pilot, a sheriff's deputy, and the tactical flight officer, a Modesto city police officer, landed in a cow pasture just off the roadway at about 10:19 p.m., Singh said.

The flight officer then ran about 20 yards toward the suspect and, while standing behind the pasture's fence, ordered him to stop beating the child, who was on the ground, Singh said.

"He refuses to comply with the orders, and the officer fires," he said, "resulting in the death of the suspect."

Firefighters from a nearby station arrived a few minutes later and tried desperately to resuscitate the child. The boy was then rushed to Emanuel Medical Center in Turlock. Despite this effort, Singh said that the child died before arrival at the hospital.

By the time the ambulance had left the scene, Singh said, almost a dozen people had witnessed some part of the incident, with at least two trying to physically stop the suspect.

"The two officers on the helicopter, they were pretty shook up about it," Singh said. "We have to kind of expect this in our line of work. But for people who were just driving home, they weren't prepared for this. They're watching a helpless baby die in front of them and they're trying to intervene, but all their efforts aren't doing anything."
This makes me feel so sick. I hate people.
 

Rukas

Capo Dei Capi
Staff member
#2
Jesus Christ. That is terrible. Knowing he is dead and hopefully burning in hell doesnt even make me feel any better :( That poor baby :(
 

Farzin

Well-Known Member
#4
^Probably didn't try hard enough.

I would've beaten that guy half to death to stop him and get some revenge.

This is a sad story.
 
#6
:( crazy ass shit. i agree with Ruk, the fact that this guy is probably burning in Hell as i type this (if there in fact is a Hell) doesn't make me feel any better. what kind of piece of shit would do this?
 

Duke

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#7
:( crazy ass shit. i agree with Ruk, the fact that this guy is probably burning in Hell as i type this (if there in fact is a Hell) doesn't make me feel any better. what kind of piece of shit would do this?

Obviously someone who is quite clearly not a 100%...

As outrageously tragic as this event is, it can not be true that this act was carried out by a person that knowingly and willingly did what he did.
 

Rukas

Capo Dei Capi
Staff member
#12
Why does everybody automatically assume he was crazy? What the fuck happened to just being a bad person? Nowadays whenever something happens people just say "oh he wasnt right in the head" like that somehow explains or justifies how a human being could be capable of doing something like that.
 
#13
well because most well adjusted, normal people don't punch, kick and stomp infants to death in public. as a relatively "sane" person i can't imagine any other sane person perpetrating an act like this. can you?
 

Rukas

Capo Dei Capi
Staff member
#15
well because most well adjusted, normal people don't punch, kick and stomp infants to death in public. as a relatively "sane" person i can't imagine any other sane person perpetrating an act like this. can you?

You can be sane and evil at the same time. I think it is dangerous to excuse the evil that happens in this world as simply crazy, it makes us believe that we cant snap into it given the right, or wrong, circumstances.

For example, the shift of views on Hitler went from "he's evil" to "he was sick in the head." That is a very dangerous thing if you ask me. Hitler wasnt some loon, he may have had issues, but he knew exactly what he was doing.

Painting these people as evil trivializes what evil people are capable of doing.

Sure this guy could have been sick in the head, it will probably turn out that he was, but we shouldnt automatically assume that only mental illness drives people to doing fucked up things.

What is next? Will they say Osama is sick in the head? The hijackers of 9/11? Saddam? No, because it;s better to keep them evil in the public's eye, easier to go to war against evil people than sick people. The double standard is dangerous to have.
 

Preach

Well-Known Member
#16
I think his point is that the very fact that the people you mentioned carried out their respective acts of manslaughter knowing very well what they were doing, is a sign of a demented personality in itself. "Crazy" isn't a brain damage, it's a personality robbed of all and any social and moral norms. Arguably, a person who is seeing things or experiencing a duality disorder is not a lot crazier than a man who stomps a baby to death. To me, both seem equally crazy and abnormal.
 

S O F I

Administrator
Staff member
#17
You can be sane and evil at the same time. I think it is dangerous to excuse the evil that happens in this world as simply crazy, it makes us believe that we cant snap into it given the right, or wrong, circumstances.

For example, the shift of views on Hitler went from "he's evil" to "he was sick in the head." That is a very dangerous thing if you ask me. Hitler wasnt some loon, he may have had issues, but he knew exactly what he was doing.

Painting these people as evil trivializes what evil people are capable of doing.

Sure this guy could have been sick in the head, it will probably turn out that he was, but we shouldnt automatically assume that only mental illness drives people to doing fucked up things.

What is next? Will they say Osama is sick in the head? The hijackers of 9/11? Saddam? No, because it;s better to keep them evil in the public's eye, easier to go to war against evil people than sick people. The double standard is dangerous to have.
First you say that a problem arose when people went from thinking that Hitler is evil to thinking that he is simply sick in the head. Then, you say that "no, because it's better to keep them evil in the public's eye" implying that it's wrong of society to label people as evil. This seems like a contradiction to me. I don't know, I'm just trying to make sure I understand what you're trying to say.

In the end, we'll all probably end up arguing semantics. I don't think we "lose" anything by labeling the man insane instead of evil and sane.
 

Flipmo

VIP Member
Staff member
#18
Mother fucker was evil, thats all. It's nice to see people tried to stop it, but what you do is you take the biggest fucking rock and hit the mother fucker over the head till his skull cracks and just keep going at it till there's nothing but fucking goo.
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top