Prince: The Internet is dead

Ristol

New York's Ambassador
#21
Again, it isn't that Prince is stupid, it's that he's obsolete in the way he claims the internet is. What we are talking about here is an artist who was hugely popular in the 80s and is admittedly still popular with critics and a certain segment of fans. I love Prince as much as anyone who was alive in the 80s, but he makes very little sense on this one.
 

Casey

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#23
Sorry Ristol but you have no idea what you are talking about. This whole "Yeah Prince was an artist who was massive in the 80's" is a misnomer because it implies that he didn't have amazing commercial success in subsequent decades which he did - see "Diamonds and Pearls" [1991], "The Gold Experience" [1995], "Musicology" [2004], "3121" [2006].

He still holds the record for the most sold out concerts any venue in the world - 21 Nights at the O2 London in 2007, and his music is always of a consistently high quality no matter the method he uses to distribute it. One thing that's important to remember is that Prince is always ahead of his time. He was the FIRST artists to distribute his music via the Internet back in 1997 with "Crystal Ball", and make no mistake, if he's not happy with the current digital business model - he's far from being the only one.
 

Ristol

New York's Ambassador
#26
I didn't say he was the only one to be bitter about losing money on the internet, I just said he was wrong about its value.

Also, Casey: you don't have to apologize to me if you think I'm wrong. If we all agreed it'd be a pretty boring board, huh?
 

Casey

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#27
I didn't say he was the only one to be bitter about losing money on the internet, I just said he was wrong about its value.

Also, Casey: you don't have to apologize to me if you think I'm wrong. If we all agreed it'd be a pretty boring board, huh?
Cool.

I don't think it's as black and white as just being about losing money on the internet. There's a lot of issues at stake - the perception of music as being a free commodity is certainly a big part of that though, for sure.
 

Ristol

New York's Ambassador
#28
I agree. But you'd have to admit he matters a lot less than he used to, no matter how fantastic Musicology was.
 

Casey

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#29
I agree. But you'd have to admit he matters a lot less than he used to, no matter how fantastic Musicology was.
I actually preferred 3121 to Musicology.

And I don't think he matters less than he used to. It's all relative. I don't see the difference between him selling out XYZ shows on the Purple Rain tour in 1985, and selling out the O2 (a 25k capacity arena) for 21 nights in 2007. He's had #1 albums on the Billboard recently too. Musically it's a question of taste, although I concede he's been less consistent over the last decade overall. I would actually argue he's the best example of an artist staying relevant over a long period of time - it's been 32 years since his debut album was released.

In what way does he matter less, in your opinion?
 

Ristol

New York's Ambassador
#31
Mozart is still relevant, yes, I agree with that. I don't quite see what that has to do with Prince.

I'm not saying Prince isn't relevant. I just think with the splintering of pop music and the way everyone only sees what they want to see and listens to what they want to listen to, Prince tends to have less clout. I'm not saying this is just.

I don't think our opinions of Prince differ too much. I think he's a legitimate pop genius and a legend and that those terms get thrown around a bit too much about people who aren't.
 

Duke

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#32
You lot are actually having a good music discussion in this.

I've never been a big Prince fan (forgive me, Casey), but if i have to make a call i'll agree with Ristol on this. Prince is a musical genius and he's definitely still relevant today and not in the way Mozart is, or Tupac, cos the difference is that Mozart and Pac are dead, they're not making music anymore. Prince still is, and he's still relevant.

But i do think he's not as relevant as he used to be.
 

Pittsey

Knock, Knock...
Staff member
#33
Mozart is still relevant, yes, I agree with that. I don't quite see what that has to do with Prince.

I'm not saying Prince isn't relevant. I just think with the splintering of pop music and the way everyone only sees what they want to see and listens to what they want to listen to, Prince tends to have less clout. I'm not saying this is just.

I don't think our opinions of Prince differ too much. I think he's a legitimate pop genius and a legend and that those terms get thrown around a bit too much about people who aren't.

I was replying to Casey saying that Prince is the best example of an artists staying relevent. I think Mozart trumps him there.
 

Casey

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#35
Oh, for the record (just thought I'd throw it in here), Prince's new album 20TEN that came out 2 days ago is fucking amazing, one of the best albums he's made in a long time. Check it out if you get a chance.
 

Casey

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#38
Prince Is Right. The Internet Is Over. « Velocity - Forbes.com



July 2010

When Prince says "the Internet is completely over," he has a point.

The artist formerly known as a weird symbol said this in a British newspaper interview earlier this week.

The newspaper, The Mirror, is going to distribute several million copies of his latest record inside their paper this week, so he granted them a rare interview. Presumably they are paying him a great deal of money for his music.

There will be no Internet downloads, though his CD will probably be distributed via other newspapers in Europe – and, who knows, even in those record store things.

Denizens of the Web seemed to arise in millions to comment on Prince's stupidity. How could the Internet be dead? If you think that, they seem to say, then just send me an email about it – Oh, that's right, you can't, because you think the Internet is dead.

But the critics didn't look hard at what he said, which had solely to do with his own professional relationship to the medium.

"The Internet is completely over," said Prince. "I don't see why I should give my new music to iTunes or anyone else. They won't pay me an advance for it and then [the public] gets angry when they can't get [the music]."


New music. For free. With a sense of entitlement. Sorry, you music-pirating websites, but I see his point. Why should people feel like that is an inalienable right? (He also said a few things about harmful addiction to digital devices, but let's stick to his disdain for the free distribution model.)

We should cheer Prince. He said outright what others are just acting on. Wired Magazine, which not long ago had a cover story on how great it is that everything is free, just came out with an iPad app that costs $4.99.

Time Magazine this week gave up some of its free print content in favor of a pay-based system. It may not work, but Time seems to be gambling that it will make more than nothing.

Moreover, Prince (who has sold over 100 million records in a 30-year career) may know what a lot of people are still learning: In any market, it is important to either deliver abundant commodities cheaply and efficiently, or cater to high-value scarcity. He has done a good job of focusing on the latter.

In that sense, he has the Internet completely figured out. In the digital world, where music is free and we're inundated with easily-duplicated information, what is scarce? Human contact.

Things that vanish in time. Things that are handcrafted, or have to be sought out. Things that identify your personal connection to a passion.

That's why, though music is free, U2 can sell concert tickets for $300 or more (a Paris show currently has seats for $930). Concerts are human contact with the band, with other fans, and they disappear after a few hours.

Replaying recordings is not the same. That's why Trent Reznor, the lead singer of the band Nine Inch Nails, sells deluxe editions of the band's CDs for hundreds of dollars.

Prince made a lot of money a few years ago by playing expensive, up-close dinner concerts at the Rio in Las Vegas for months on end, and people paid between $120 and $312.10 (for dinner, priced for personal affiliation with Prince's 3121 album.)

This week he's at a huge venue in France, where some 22,000 tickets will sell for $106 apiece, and another 3,000 premium tickets go for $157 each.

That's more than tickets for either The Black Eyed Peas or Pearl Jam cost earlier in the week. From Prince's point of view, there's something to be said for making yourself scarce.
 

_carmi

me, myself & us
#40
Coming from the artist who shut down some of his fan sites.

Oh, for the record (just thought I'd throw it in here), Prince's new album 20TEN that came out 2 days ago is fucking amazing, one of the best albums he's made in a long time. Check it out if you get a chance.
Too bad it's technically only available in Europe. It will be available online eventually (if it's not already the case), but why bother for an artist who thought non-Europeans just weren't good enough for him.

I'm not a fan, but he is surely aware that he has fans outside of Europe. If he isn't down with the Internet, why doesn't he make sure these non-European fans get access to his new music too? I find Prince doesn't care about his fans. Shutting fan sites, not giving access to his new material to all his fans, what's next?

I meant in a contemporary sense.

Classical music is a different scenario altogether.
Why?

I like to think that if Mozart is still known to this day for his musical genius, it's because he has been able to be relevant throughout times. We'll see if in a couple of centuries, Prince will be as relevant, or any other artist for that matter. Sure, classical music is a genre that is ancient compared to some others, but it remains a genre that is still practised to this day. How is it a different genre than pop, rap, or dance music? Those are all genres with artists more relevant than others.
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top