^^ lol
IF REALLY TRYIN TO DISCUSS SITUATION YOU HAVE TO NOT BE SELFISH & PUT YOUR SELF IN DIFFERENT SHOES, MOST OF THE TIME THE BEST RATIONAL CONCLUSIONS ARRIVE AFTER PRIMITIVE & EMOTIONAL PROCESS YOU CANT VOID IT OR ITS FOOGAZY; THERES NOTHIN AT FUCKIN ALL RATIONAL ABOUT THIS SITUATION SO YOU HAVE TO WORK YOUR SELF TO RATIONALALITY OTHER WISE AGAIN,ITS JUST AIR BULLSHIT WITH NO PURPOSE.
SITTING DOWN THINKING ABOUT CORRECT JUSTICE BEST SOCIETAL BEHAVIORS ALL OF THE TIME FROM BEGGINNIN COMPLETELY OBLIVES CORRECT BEHAVIOR IN SOCIETY & VERY FOUNDATION OF JUSTICE
CANT DO YOUR BEST "SOLVE" SITUATIONS IF CANT GET YOUR HEAD OUT YOUR ASS TO START
funny you should say that. to an extent i agree. first of all, i just want to say that the smooth penis remark obviously wasn't entirely serious. come one, dude.
i agree that if you think too much on a thing, you can think circles around it to the point where you become uncertain. the more angles you try to look at a case from, the more obscure becomes the line that seperates good and bad, or right and wrong if you will. i don't get what you mean by "foundation of justice" though. you are saying that analyzing and thinking about things from an ideal point of view, as opposed to being caught in the middle of it, obliviates the foundation of justice? how do you figure? justice is a man-made principle which is the result of thinking from an ideal viewpoint. the constitution wasn't written on notes while the creators where dug down in trenches taking enemy fire or while they were being mugged. a bunch of old people sat down together in a room and wrote it down after having speculated on what would serve everyone best. the word "justice" is all about perception. it can mean one thing to me, it can mean something else to somebody else. that's why there is a law that everyone has to follow. you HAVE to think ideally to create such a law, or else the law would only fit a select few humans, and people would end up not following it anyway. this one law does not take into account emotions like vengeance. in fact, it encourages people to not act on such emotions and let the system assign justice.
let me ask you, are you implying that you would gladly rape an 18 year old boy's asshole with a wrench if he raped your daughter? and if your answer is yes, what seperates you from the boy? what seperates your act of sodomy from his act of sodomy? one thing. you feel that he deserves it. this is something that is entirely your opinion, and you came to this opinion because of all the things you have experienced in your life. when the boy committed the act of sodomy, his mind didn't black out. he had conscious thoughts all the way through the rape, suggesting he must have experienced things in his life that others did not, for him to have these thoughts that to others seem sociopathic. your experiences and his experiences are different, but neither of you asked for them. neither of you asked to be born. neither of you asked to be put in any of the situations you are put in. therefore, when a third party is assigning justice to a matter, it should be taken into account that the foundation of justice should not be based on human emotions at all. things such as jealousy and vengeance should not dictate our society. our society should dictate us so as to keep these emotions under wraps and keep them in check.
now you're speaking about the foundation of justice, and you seem to have it misunderstood. the intent that lies in the word "justice" is balance. what has happened now is we have a girl that got raped, a boy that got the life beat out of him with a bat (if you own one, take it in your hand and try hitting it gently on your head. it should give you an idea of how much it would fucking hurt to take a beating from one), who also got raped by a metal object that could easily rip open and puncture the intestines, something which would cause a rather horrific death and is borderline torture, something i'm gonna go out on a limb and suggest is worse than rape. the boy will face legal consequences, the father will most likely face legal consequences, the daughter won't have a father there for a time. is that balance? is that justice? if so, you have a fucked up perception, sorry for saying so.
humans today are half modern society half caveman. when things go bad, people lean on the rules/regulations and security that a modern society provides, but when they can't control their emotions they justify their own actions by saying it was revenge. revenge and justice (like mentioned previously) are both man-made principles. if they were never invented, the world would be completely different. it has nothing to do with instincts. either be a caveman, go around thinking it's okay to rape anyone who rapes someone you care for, but shut the fuck up when a burglar is trying to rob your house. when you have a heart-attack don't try to call 911. don't buy your food in a supermarket, move into the woods and learn to hunt and fish. or learn to control your emotios and be a part of the society in full. get all the benefits, just don't break the damn law.
ps. sofi, i know he probably understands, i just haven't written essays for so long
