Eh, right. Sure it might be tighter, but in no offense to you, i dont know what kind of loose girls you have sex with that you must use the asshole or what are you packing (neither do i want to).
Oh my, you challenge my trophy score AND my manhood. If I was insecure, I would fall right into that trap. Unfortunately, you have gotten the completely wrong idea, friend. I never judged you for not liking anal, you however talked about how revolting it is, thus my "don't be a pussy" remark. Either I have to admit that I'm revolting, or I have to make myself think you're a pussy. I'm obviously going for the latter.
My cock is a little bit longer than the average, and quite thick, but certainly not a horse cock. Hope that clears things up, thanks for not asking.
Also, pussy size is like dick size. You don't get a larger dick by having lots of sex, and a loose pussy does not necessarily denote the same thing. A tight pussy does not mean she's a virgin either.
I personally find it alot more enjoyable to use the "bidden" hole as you call it.
And it surely is not about whats forbidden and whats not (and if thats the deal, thats more elementary than i thought)
Human beings on a worldwide scale are more prone to becoming obsessed with things not available to them, as opposed to things they can easily access. It's a part of who we all are, so don't make it about maturity. I'm childish for being excited about getting to fuck a girl in the ass? Yeah, that's so second grade.
If you look at other fetishes, mostly they are things that aren't socially accepted. Why do you think that is? What makes a fetish a fetish? The very core of modern society is to deny your instincts, to steer clear of anything that's taboo. And to your remark about it being elementary, what about exhibitionists? Is that elementary too, to have sex in front of others? How do you figure it is elementary? Because kids follow instincts while grown-ups follow their own concoction of "reason"? You are completely off-base here. Just to further demonstrate that you are wrong, if you look at the monkey species that we are genetically most alike, you'll see that they have ways of practicing sex that is reminiscent of porno orgies. Dicks all over the place in every and any hole.
I also never said someone fucks them just because it just so happens to be the one and only place that emits fescies in a human body, but then again the fact remains, you are dipping your dick in the only place that traffics fescies and when doing so thats the turnoff in it for me.
You didn't say it directly, but you never introduced a more feasible point of argument. If you knew what you said wasn't the case, why did you say it? Your comparison gave the impression that anal sex with a girl roots in a deeper desire to have sex with another male. Heterosexual anal sex has nothing to do with homosexuality. It is comparable to the act of engaging in homosexual sex. And I just gave you good-will.
its not about being a pussy or whatnot and if your weak idea of someone not being a pussy is fucking a girl in the asshole, then i guess you should really take a look outside and get back to reality.
Now we are being semantical. I can respect that someone opts to not have anal sex. Stating that the pussy feels nicer, you prefer to look into her face, or you just don't have a thing for anal sex are all valid reasons that do not discriminate those who do like anal sex. You went and said that it is revolting as hell. That's weak, and discriminates me. Presumable, the out-carrier of revolting acts is revolting himself, at least as perceived by the person who found the acts revolting. In this context, you indirectly said I'm revolting for liking anal sex. Or with my best linguistic abilities, I could only ever derive that interpretation out of what you said.
you see some people nailing their penises into a woodplank, would you be a pussy if you dont happen to get anything special from it?
some people like gagging women with their genitals, yet again are you pussy if you dont want to do so?
Those people are sick in the heads. Also, anal sex does not "necessarily" involve any puncturing of the skin. Furthermore, it does not initiate bodily reflexes that are reserved for life-threatening situations, like when you can't breathe. If you refer to what I said about monkeys (read up on chimps and bonobos, and their sex lives) and what I said about you being the one who called me revolting and me being the one who simply responded to that, you see that your comparisons are, once again, far off the map.
The only reason why I would ever have constant anal sex with a woman among the "basic stuff" is if their lovelife demanded it and they were my partner at the time. I've had this once and I didint loose my mind over it but can't say I honestly enjoyed it more.
Its not about chickening out about anything, it's just what people prefer, and when I meet something that I just dont understand (example, feet fetishes) I question them.
Fair enough, but try to do so in a less girly fashion. If anal sex was common practice, the fetish factor would be long gone by 2008. It's only because it is considered harder to achieve than regular sex that it is considered a milestone.
See, the idea with what I'm doing here is, I'm justifying (not because I have to) my fascination with anal sex to someone who does not understand that there is nothing wrong with it. Generally, when people make remarks like yours about anal sex I'll call them pussies or pansies until they boil it down to "but girls have poo up there

". That's normally the reason why people don't like anal sex, because of the poo. That's your main point for not engaging. It makes sense that you apply an opposite logic to me, but even people who like anal sex don't like poo.