...that nowhere on the internet is there even a single site that allows posting on a forum or instant messenger where you can post whatever without a screen name (handle), password, or e-mail address to be displayed or needed to post?
And isnt it odd that there is no site offering the sending and receiving of e-mail anonymously without an "etc." on the left side of the at etc. dot com part or the whole etc. at etc. dot come part?
Like with phones... You can call someone and have it to where the phone number wont show up on another's caller ID. It should be an option for that with e-mail.
As for forum and messenger sites, dont you think in today's internet society there should be sites with an actual total anonymous option? Why are designers of websites and messengers all following the usual program? Is something or somebody forcing them to be similar to the next?
If they ever made sites like being suggested they should be called AA non-member sites. AA is for alternative anonymous. On such sites you are not a member, but may post. Shouldnt have been more complex than that from the get-go on sites. Getting us to conform to have more than one name in society is as having the number of disarray.
Matter of fact, there needs to be an additional internet. Call it Internet A. A is for either Anonymous or Alternative: where this additional internet hosts only those kinds of AA non-member sites and has the whole optional anonymous e-mail array set up. It would hinder e-stalkers (they'd be blinded as to who is who. They even wouldnt be able to know if it's the same person making a thread/post to where they might continue bitchin' about something said from ago towards a person) and keep others from somehow coming in the name of what would be your e-mail or handle.
Society's social interaction through the net could be better. Just think... when you're out in public, socializing by exchanging brief comments and questions with stangers, you normally wouldnt ask for their name or name they go by. Nor do they wear tags with any names on it. And neither do you. Why shouldnt it have been more like that on the internet already?
Face it, ppl on this current internet are not truely reflecting society with the fear over their heads that the results of their finger tip actions are by a log that can be traced to a location. There are things you would say to a person, in person, that you wouldnt say to that person on the net. And there are things you wouldnt say to a person, in person, that you would say to that person on the net. There would be a realer society if there ever would be an additional Internet A. Even more real if it doesnt even keep a log that can lead to a location.
And isnt it odd that there is no site offering the sending and receiving of e-mail anonymously without an "etc." on the left side of the at etc. dot com part or the whole etc. at etc. dot come part?
Like with phones... You can call someone and have it to where the phone number wont show up on another's caller ID. It should be an option for that with e-mail.
As for forum and messenger sites, dont you think in today's internet society there should be sites with an actual total anonymous option? Why are designers of websites and messengers all following the usual program? Is something or somebody forcing them to be similar to the next?
If they ever made sites like being suggested they should be called AA non-member sites. AA is for alternative anonymous. On such sites you are not a member, but may post. Shouldnt have been more complex than that from the get-go on sites. Getting us to conform to have more than one name in society is as having the number of disarray.
Matter of fact, there needs to be an additional internet. Call it Internet A. A is for either Anonymous or Alternative: where this additional internet hosts only those kinds of AA non-member sites and has the whole optional anonymous e-mail array set up. It would hinder e-stalkers (they'd be blinded as to who is who. They even wouldnt be able to know if it's the same person making a thread/post to where they might continue bitchin' about something said from ago towards a person) and keep others from somehow coming in the name of what would be your e-mail or handle.
Society's social interaction through the net could be better. Just think... when you're out in public, socializing by exchanging brief comments and questions with stangers, you normally wouldnt ask for their name or name they go by. Nor do they wear tags with any names on it. And neither do you. Why shouldnt it have been more like that on the internet already?
Face it, ppl on this current internet are not truely reflecting society with the fear over their heads that the results of their finger tip actions are by a log that can be traced to a location. There are things you would say to a person, in person, that you wouldnt say to that person on the net. And there are things you wouldnt say to a person, in person, that you would say to that person on the net. There would be a realer society if there ever would be an additional Internet A. Even more real if it doesnt even keep a log that can lead to a location.
