autopsy picture of 2pac (easily offended?, don't click)

[Kadafi Son]

I was starrin at the upper chest near the neck and it just looked weird to me, it looked like a copy and paste job to me. Just look at were they opended the body up it just looks werid.

This is some freaky shit! That pic ain't real! Look at the chest! Look at it! No bitch, look harder! Can you see it?! That chest looks faker than Chingy's thug mentality! If it was real, the openings on Pac's chest would have more reflection because of the blood. Its a cut and paste! You can't deny dat!

 

[lil_angelo]

http://mypage.bluewin.ch/2pac/2pac/2pac_pic6.jpg

a very fake picture just look what i said in my other post.

 

[ApacalypseNow]

The pic is definately fake, and whoever put it out should be sued if thats possible.

 

[streetfame77]

that aint pac R.I.P

 

[Rukas]

Look, the fact is this. If it was Tupac, the photo would show his face. Why only leak a photo not showing his face clearly when you obviously had access to the body? Because had the face been shown people would see its NOT Tupac.

Its really that simple.

The colored photo is obviously photo shopped, blood does not glow red, it would be in shadow on his lower stomach just like the rest of that region. I would also image there would be more blood on the table had it been a real autopsy, although Im not an expert in that regard.

The fact is. If you have access to a dead stars body and want to release a photo of it to make money, you take a phpto that is unquestionably that star, you show their face. Why would the person take a photo and not show Pac's face if it really was Tupac?

 

[BSweet]

Look, the fact is this. If it was Tupac, the photo would show his face. Why only leak a photo not showing his face clearly when you obviously had access to the body? Because had the face been shown people would see its NOT Tupac.

Its really that simple.

The colored photo is obviously photo shopped, blood does not glow red, it would be in shadow on his lower stomach just like the rest of that region. I would also image there would be more blood on the table had it been a real autopsy, although Im not an expert in that regard.

The fact is. If you have access to a dead stars body and want to release a photo of it to make money, you take a phpto that is unquestionably that star, you show their face. Why would the person take a photo and not show Pac's face if it really was Tupac?

You think it's fake? Why should it be? The corroners office has never denied that the picture shows 2Pac, what they definitely would have done if it was fake!

Plus that blood thing is wrong, there ain't that much blood during an authopsy (I did only attend one). Plus i think that they could have cleaned that table to take the picture. The goal of an authopsy picture is not to show as much blood as possible but to show that the authopsy was done correctly.

The reason that you do not see the face may be that the guy who leaked it had left at least a little respect for a dead body. Remember that the picture was not released by some crazy fan on the web but by a journalist that did some research.

I'm sure it's not faked. The cuts have been made where they belong to and it's not that easy to fake all the tattoos.

And yeah, the colored has been photoshoped.

 

[BSweet]

Plus read this:

"Neither of them however, denied that it was an authentic photo of Shakurs body."
from http://www.2pacboard.com/forum/thread125939.html

Another proof for the validity of the picture is that it is a polaroid photo. If the police did an investigation about the pic and they don't doubt that it is real they should have check all this.

Last thing. Rukahs you should delete the picture. I think that I remember Afeni paying tribute to Hitemup for NOT showing the picture...

 

[makavelli963]

I think its time to close this thread, as everything that could of been said has been and all the possible Pro/Con points about it have been stated.
Rukas plz Close this thread and as was said before delete these pictures off the 2pacboard.com website. I got a lot of respect for yall, but this is trully beyond expectations, and i hope you all will come to the conclusion that this hero of ours needs to rest in peace. Let Him Rest..Do it For Pac


R.i.p.Makaveli

 

[Ay-G]

^ lol

ya we can close this now.

 

[Rukas]

You think it's fake? Why should it be? The corroners office has never denied that the picture shows 2Pac, what they definitely would have done if it was fake!

Plus that blood thing is wrong, there ain't that much blood during an authopsy (I did only attend one). Plus i think that they could have cleaned that table to take the picture. The goal of an authopsy picture is not to show as much blood as possible but to show that the authopsy was done correctly.

The reason that you do not see the face may be that the guy who leaked it had left at least a little respect for a dead body. Remember that the picture was not released by some crazy fan on the web but by a journalist that did some research.

I'm sure it's not faked. The cuts have been made where they belong to and it's not that easy to fake all the tattoos.

And yeah, the colored has been photoshoped.

The photo was sold by someone that worked there. Im sure they could have gotten a lot more money had it actually shown Pac's face.

The coroner has not denied the photo, but they have not confirmed it either, and why should they deny it? I mean, do you think they really care? If they did care, the only real answer they would give is a denial, because the selling of this photo was illegal and they could be sued for letting it leak. So therefore if anyone actually took the accusation that this is a real photo serious, they would have denied it, but there’s no real proof to suggest this photo is real, so they’ve ignored it.

And just because the cuts are in the proper spot, does not mean its real. As I said, this is probably a real autopsy, just not Tupac's. Had it been Pac's, they would have taken a photo of his face if they intended on selling it because it would make more money. They sold an autopsy photo for money, I doubt they said to themselves "oh well Ill pimp a dead man, but I have enough respect not to show his face." Come on thats just illogical.

And as for faking the tattoos being difficult... Its actually really easy.

 

[Dave D]

^^^^
wow .. that is quite impressive. That photo is now, i believe, fake.

 

[Rukas]

Had I had enough time to find clearer photos of the tats I could have done them perfectly but I just took the photos from http://www.2pacboard.com/tupac/tattoos.html

 

[bimi]

I belive that the pic is real but its not Pac...they used it to make it look like pac and get some money on that pic....this has allready been told on the thread so its nothing new.

i just have one Q: who leaked the un-tatted pic of...."Pac"? and when?
Bimi

 

[BSweet]

i just have one Q: who leaked the un-tatted pic of...."Pac"? and when?
Bimi

That's not pac on the pic. It's some skinny white kid!

 

[BSweet]

The photo was sold by someone that worked there. Im sure they could have gotten a lot more money had it actually shown Pac's face.

The coroner has not denied the photo, but they have not confirmed it either, and why should they deny it? I mean, do you think they really care? If they did care, the only real answer they would give is a denial, because the selling of this photo was illegal and they could be sued for letting it leak. So therefore if anyone actually took the accusation that this is a real photo serious, they would have denied it, but there’s no real proof to suggest this photo is real, so they’ve ignored it.

And just because the cuts are in the proper spot, does not mean its real. As I said, this is probably a real autopsy, just not Tupac's. Had it been Pac's, they would have taken a photo of his face if they intended on selling it because it would make more money. They sold an autopsy photo for money, I doubt they said to themselves "oh well Ill pimp a dead man, but I have enough respect not to show his face." Come on thats just illogical.

And as for faking the tattoos being difficult... Its actually really easy.

How about this one:

"Neither of them however, denied that it was an authentic photo of Shakurs body."

You think that the police is dumb enough to think the pictures are real when they are actually a photoshop-work? Do you think it is easy to fake a polaroid picture? I don't know a way to fake a polaroid such that a police laboratory couldn't figure it out in 5 minutes.

The reason that the picture doesn't show his face could be that the pictures "have been taken for training purposed". You don't show faces at medicine books etc.

What about the corroners report? has it also been faked? Somebody from the states should just call the doctor that performed the authopsy.

And even if there was a chance that the pictures are real. I don't think that it makes sense to say that they are faked since it does only heat the alive-theories...

BSweet

 

[bimi]

That's not pac on the pic. It's some skinny white kid!

thanx for helping me out on this one dummie....

go back and check the "" on PAC.....if it has "" then it means SO CALLED, it is NOT him but someone who looks like him...and by me typing "PAC" i mean the so-called Pac...I know it aint Pac

any way, someone else who know when that pic leaked out and who leaked it?? thanx BSweet

 

[BSweet]

any way, someone else who know when that pic leaked out and who leaked it?? thanx BSweet

It was released by some guy called "John Doe" (caution, that could be ironic). I think it was 1 to 3 years ago that i've first seen it. The guy who made it just used the original cuts from Pacs authopsy and added it to some pic.

 

[alleyezonme12]

edit