I understand if people say there wasn't enough evidence to convict her beyond a reasonable doubt. But I don't understand how people can claim she's innocent when all her actions show otherwise.
If she was coerced into writing the memorandum, her lawyers should have been able to throw it out IF they threw out the verbal confession. Why did the memorandum hold?
If she was coerced into writing the memorandum, her lawyers should have been able to throw it out IF they threw out the verbal confession. Why did the memorandum hold?