Dizal said:haha wat bullshitfuck rolling stones magazine
YOu can, but watch for the paper cuts.

Dizal said:haha wat bullshitfuck rolling stones magazine

Lennon shouldn't have made it?jason_g_718 said:there's some people on there that shouldn't have even made it (Roy Orbison, John Lennon)
How's that different from having NWA and Dr. Dre as separate artists?Another thing that pissed me off, is that they have John Lennon on the list basically twice. They listed The Beatles at #1, and then listed Lennon as a solo act in like the 20's.
jason_g_718 said:Top 20, I'm not sure about that. POSSIBLY. But, I know for damn sure that Pac DEFINATELY SHOULD HAVE BEEN in the Top 50.
Lennon shouldn't have made it?
Imagine > Tupac
How's that different from having NWA and Dr. Dre as separate artists?
LatinoPride said:rofl @ Eminem being above 2Pac
I swear to god white america is obsessed with Eminem.
june16 said:Sometime last year on 'Access Hollywood' Pac was #9 among top 10 artists of alltime. He was the only rapper on the list.
Rollingstone dont know shit about rap music they better keep it out of their issues. Plus they have 'dedicated 2pac haters' on their staff.
A typical example, Toure.
And John Lennon deserves to be in there on the strength of his solo work & the Beatles deserve to be in for being the fucking Beatles! Paul McCartney probably should've made it in twice to for his solo work & work with Wings.
And nah, I don' think Tupac deserved to be in the Top 20, maybe - & that's a big maybe - the top 50.