While very interesting, it's not true. My dad has worked at the Pentagon for 10+ years and supervised the rebuilding process after 9/11. I mentioned this before and I said I would provide photos as proof, but I forgot to look. I'll do so after this post. Not only that, but he as well as I have been fascinated by planes since day 1. He gets it from his Grandfather, I get it from dad. We all 3 have pilot licenses, as well as other people in my family. None of us have commercial licenses, but that's not needed for this knowledge I'm about to drop. We've talked about this thousands of times since the incident, even before this little video was made.
Where to start?...
Let's start with how the hole in the wall looks like it was a missile because there is no wing formation left in it. Wings can break off. While in history, it has rarely, if ever, happened. Wings are very very strong. If you've ever been on a commercial airline and sat by the window you'll notice that the wings may shake up and down. That's not because they are weak, but they are designed to have flexibility for turbulence. But given enough force, wings can break off. For example, if you were to fly sideways and hit the ground with a wing, it will fall off. Obviously, going 530+ mph in a plane into a cement wall, the wings will fall off. The fuselage will penetrate the wall because it's the heavy and slim. "Where would the wings have gone then?" you may ask. I can't answer that. I just don't know. It's possible the fire surrounding the outer wall burned them. I don't understand the law of physics enough, but it's possible the wings broke off, but still had enough exerting force combined with the wind of the plane to follow into the wall and burn in there. The same applies for the tail.
As for witness accounts that claim it was a missle. Well, they're taking out of context what the witnesses are saying. They are saying it sounded like a missle. When you generally hear a plane, you either hear it during take off, landing, in the air at a high altitude, or a low-altitude at a low speed. Of course a plan that low at that high speed will sound like a missle. No witness in this piece said they saw it. There are in fact, people who did see the plane that morning--including people I know personally that my dad works with. There were several cars who had their antennas clipped off and there were knocked over light posts knocked down.
"Buildings don't eat planes. Planes leave wreckages." They went on to show plane wreckages. Well all of those images were in fields and open areas. This was inside of a building. Yes, buildings eat planes. You didn't see the planes after they hit WTC did you? People just assume that's true because no one ever did it before 9/11. Also, there was wreckage found around the Pentalawn. I remember seeing a piece of the metal where the emblem for American Airlines was, wheels, etc.
"Incredible stunts. Incompetent pilots." Ever since that day, my dad and myself have marveled at how this guy could fly a plane that low at that speed. We've talked amongst other pilots and people who work for the Pentagon and FAA (you may think I'm lying because it sounds like I'm getting inside info, but anyone can get this info and they are just people we accosiate with). This act clearly did not last long. They show a map of his course in this piece, but don't show the altitude he is at during that flight. If you were to fly that low, for that long, you would eventually hit something. Do you realize how fast you would pass things? You don't even have time to make judgements. If he wouldn't hit a building by luck, he'd definitely hit the ground with the fuselage at one point because it is impossible to hold any altitude perfectly even with autopilot. And you don't just "bounce" as this piece claims it could have done. The plane would crash. As it turns out, the guy couldn't find his target and took it down to the nearest thing he could find. It's possible that he was looking for the White House, but then that would rule out the plane in Pennsylvania, so that probably wasn't true. While it's a great target, I don't think it was his intention. I don't think even they could think it would penetrate that wall.
I can't speak on behalf of the films. Perhaps what they are claiming is true. I wouldn't doubt that. I don't think that means that it was a missle on the video. We didn't see the Zapruder film for years after JFK's death. That doesn't mean they were hiding other gunmen.
Bottom line is that it was a plane. There were even phone call from that flight and they even stated where they were. Are you trying to tell me the government would make that plane disappear and substitute it with a missle? Get out of here.
