MATW95 said:1. How so?
2. Why are you in this thread then?
1. You should know, and if not, you are doomed by your lack of understanding.
2. To voice my opinion.
MATW95 said:1. How so?
2. Why are you in this thread then?
SicC said:michael jordan was not the greatest player he was the second greatest scorer in the nba behind kareem. Magic Johnson was the best all around player in the NBA. Look at his stats.
pz
wrong. jordan was a nine-time all-defensive first teamer. jordan was just as good on defense as he was on offense, which is why he was and is the greatest player ever. kobe is too selfish, and will not be able to win a championship without a dominant center.Ciek said:Difficult to say, because each one of those players we're dominate in they're ERA. I'd say kobe bryant will go down as the greatest ever! He has jordans fade away, better defensive player, an the three point shot jordan never had. 81 points? God damn!
Jordan averaged 6.5 more ppg than kareem over his career. kareem was a great scorer because he was 7'2" with long arms, and he new how to use them (i.e. the skyhook). jordan was better at creating his own shot, getting to the basket, creating space, and finding space without the ball. and he had much better range than kareem.SicC said:michael jordan was not the greatest player he was the second greatest scorer in the nba behind kareem. Magic Johnson was the best all around player in the NBA. Look at his stats.
pz

artisticgurl said:I gotta agree with AmerikazMost.
I voted Jordan, he's the reason I played til 9 at night in that dust pit in our backyard. I see todays game and each team has a MJ wannabe, he changed the game and did it so well.
SicC said:If it wasnt for Larry Bird and Magic Johnson the NBA would have nvr made it through the eighties, it was wracked with poor attendance on TV and at most of the venues, they revolutionized basketball. Jordan was a good mixture of them both but he lacked the ability to really get his team into the game, no doubt he could take over a game in the last two minutes and pretty much win the game single handely but that does nothing in my book, to see a team win a game means alot more to me, it explains why the usa basketball team nvr can win the gold. Fundementals for one thing and the overall ability to create for others is missing in the US. There is an exceptional few that can do this in the NBA now a days. But if u watch the euro teams they have solid fundemantals and great team work and ability to create for others..well greece and a few other teams not all..just generalizing there.
And to amerika..u have valid points but career wise this is what i mean...these are career stats. when someone can almost average a triple double a game..now thats something special in my opinoin. not taking a thing away from jordan he was fun to watch.
Magic Rebounds-7.7 assists-12.3 points- 19.5.
Jordan- Rebounds-6.20 assists-5.3 Points- 30.1
SicC said:If it wasnt for Larry Bird and Magic Johnson the NBA would have nvr made it through the eighties, it was wracked with poor attendance on TV and at most of the venues, they revolutionized basketball. Jordan was a good mixture of them both but he lacked the ability to really get his team into the game, no doubt he could take over a game in the last two minutes and pretty much win the game single handely but that does nothing in my book, to see a team win a game means alot more to me, it explains why the usa basketball team nvr can win the gold. Fundementals for one thing and the overall ability to create for others is missing in the US. There is an exceptional few that can do this in the NBA now a days. But if u watch the euro teams they have solid fundemantals and great team work and ability to create for others..well greece and a few other teams not all..just generalizing there.
Bank Robber said:Patrick Ewing and Hakeem Olajuwon came along in 85 and 86
and Barkley was solid in the late 80s
artisticgurl said:Im not saying Jordan was the only one to, but for me, he was the one that changed it into something I love. His style and determination is something I look at and admire. I see Bird as the generation before Jordan (obviously is) but as far as the game Jordan took off where Bird finished, he may be pretty on a score sheet and he obviously moved his team like no other but to watch I prefer Jordan. Also with getting a team into the game, you gotta have players that are willing to do that for you. It's like in one of the DVD's it shows Jordan talking to Paxton during a time out and you know he's leading him and when they go back Jordan gets it to him and they win. Thats leadership and Jordan certainly didnt lack that.
Well if you judged it just by that, than some of Russell's teammates would be greater winners than him. I wouldn't argue against the claim for Russell, but all sports fans talk about Jordan's will to win. There was somehting you could see in his eyes late in close games. It was almost inhuman.Morris said:By the way, how can someone call Jordan the greatest winner in any sport while also having Bill Russell, who won 9 titles in 11 years in the same sport, in this poll?![]()
ive been completely stoned all dayAmerikazMost said:^ Do you mean I can't say, "Larry," I have to say "Larry Bird"? Or did you mean to say, "You can't separate Magic from Bird"?