Father Guns Down His Sons Teenage Bully

#1
http://www.courttv.com/trials/blount/012105_ctv.html#continue

Trial set to start for man charged with killing his son's teenage bully


By Bo Susan Rosser
Court TV
ORLANDO, Fla. — Fed up with a teenage school bully who allegedly attacked his son, Clyde Blount gunned him down in a drive-by shooting, according to prosecutors.

Clyde Blount III is charged with second-degree murder in the death of 16-year-old Lonnie Hillery. His trial is expected to begin Monday in the Ninth Circuit Court in Orlando. If convicted, he faces a minimum of 25 years in prison.

Prosecutors say Blount, 41, killed Hillery minutes after speaking to a school vice principal about obtaining a restraining order against him.

Blount allegedly had met with the another vice principal of Apopka High School and asked how his son, Clyde Blount IV — aka C.J. — should handle any future attacks by Hillery. The classmates had clashed several times during the previous weekend, according to police reports.

Story continues

advertisement



The vice principal advised C.J. to report to a teacher if Hillery accosted him again. After speaking to the Blounts, the school official met with Hillery and told him to stay away from his classmate.

Despite the warning, Hillery followed C.J. off the school bus on the afternoon of Feb. 17, 2004. He then repeatedly punched C.J. and kicked him after he fell to the ground, according to witnesses.

When the boy, reportedly bruised and crying, returned home and described the attack to his father, Blount grabbed his .38 caliber automatic and began searching for Hillery in his family's white minivan, prosecutors contend. His son rode along in the front passenger seat.

According to the state, as the van approached Hillery and several friends outside a Florida elementary school, Blount pointed his handgun out the window and fired several shots. The boys fled, but not before a bullet caught Hillery in the back and pierced his liver.

After his gun jammed, Blount told police, he stopped firing and he and his son returned to Hawthorne Village, the nearby apartment complex where they lived.

"I did not intend to shoot or kill him, just scare him," Blount later told investigators.

Four gun casings were later recovered by police on the floor of Blount's Aerostar van.

Meanwhile, Hillery's friends hailed a passing pickup truck and asked the driver for help. The driver raced Hillery to a nearby fire station, where he received CPR and was then transferred to the Orlando Regional Medical Center in an ambulance.

Before the victim died, he recounted the events to fire department personnel and said it was C.J.'s father who shot him. Hillery died at the hospital from internal bleeding, according to the medical examiner.

After several 911 calls from witnesses, police located and arrested Clyde Blount and his son.

Though Blount faces second-degree murder charges, the defense is expected to argue for a lesser charge of manslaughter. C.J., who had no criminal record, was not charged and no longer attends Apopka High School.

Prosecutors acknowledge that the victim instigated the fights between the two classmates, and Blount admits to shooting at Hillery.

School administrators and the school bus driver are expected to testify that Hillery initiated the feud. The bus driver told police that on the afternoon of the shooting, Hillery chased C.J. off the bus, even though he had been ordered to stay in his seat.

Police reports also support this theory. Blount called police days before the shooting to complain that Hillery had harassed C.J. and was now harassing C.J.'s 12-year-old cousin. After the call, C.J. confronted Hillery on his cousin's behalf and escalated the feud. The cousin will likely testify about this incident.

C.J. is expected to testify for both the prosecution and defense, although he told police at the time of his arrest that his father had fired several shots but did not hit anyone.

Blount is expected to take the stand and tell jurors why he was enraged enough to chase down his son's bully with a gun.

Jury selection begins Monday. The trial is being shown live on Court TV Extra.
 
#5
ken said:
Im very interested in what people have to say about this!!!
Can people please just drop a couple of lines on what they think of the situation
i said it don't be a fucking bully, get a life. It all starts at home man everything in life no exceptions. If your kid is a bully you must look at yourself first and your home life, etc. Yes it's bad that the kid got shot but he asked for it, he didn't realize that what he was doing was wrong, because his parents didn't educate him properly or they just didn't care enough. It could be many things.
 
#6
Just another example of people taking things too far. But this also shows that the law is helpless in resolving situations of this type. That Hillery kid should have been punished right away. He got what was coming for him, Karma's a bitch. Street justice was served here, nothing else.
 
#7
Wow man....why didnt the father just go up to the kid and take him by the neck and tell him if he touches his son again...he'll "insert threat here"

To gun down a 16 year old is psychotic.
 
#9
The Almighty Nasquad said:
But this also shows that the law is helpless in resolving situations of this type. That Hillery kid should have been punished right away. He got what was coming for him, Karma's a bitch. Street justice was served here, nothing else.
...
 
#10
Vaudeville said:
i said it don't be a fucking bully, get a life. It all starts at home man everything in life no exceptions. If your kid is a bully you must look at yourself first and your home life, etc. Yes it's bad that the kid got shot but he asked for it, he didn't realize that what he was doing was wrong, because his parents didn't educate him properly or they just didn't care enough. It could be many things.
does that justify murder?
 
#11
CoolWaterz said:
Wow man....why didnt the father just go up to the kid and take him by the neck and tell him if he touches his son again...he'll "insert threat here"
To gun down a 16 year old is psychotic.
that is also breaking the law!!! Do you think that this can be excused as a literal following of the law against this is 'illogical' and nonsensical?
 
#12
Well this is a hell of a lot harder than the 'better mommy' thread.

Both the killer & the victim are in the wrong. The father shouldn't have killed the bully but then again if the bully wasn't being such a litte bastard then he wouldn't've got anything.

Schools are shit at preventing bullying & are even gayer when they punish students who fight back.

I think the father is justified in that, 'punching & kicking' can result in 'not breathing'.
(Obviously he's not justified in that, taking another's life can rarely be considered completely right')

But especially if the bully had started to threaten other members of the family, I mean, if the bully wanted to pick a fight why didn't he go straight after the father?
Oh I knoew, because he'd get beat down like the little bitch that he is.

Anyways, father should've just leathered him (although he'd probably serve time for that) or better yet, leather the bully's father.
 
#13
CalcuoCuchicheo said:
Well this is a hell of a lot harder than the 'better mommy' thread.

Both the killer & the victim are in the wrong. The father shouldn't have killed the bully but then again if the bully wasn't being such a litte bastard then he wouldn't've got anything.

Schools are shit at preventing bullying & are even gayer when they punish students who fight back.

I think the father is justified in that, 'punching & kicking' can result in 'not breathing'.
(Obviously he's not justified in that, taking another's life can rarely be considered completely right')

But especially if the bully had started to threaten other members of the family, I mean, if the bully wanted to pick a fight why didn't he go straight after the father?
Oh I knoew, because he'd get beat down like the little bitch that he is.

Anyways, father should've just leathered him (although he'd probably serve time for that) or better yet, leather the bully's father.
no ifs and buts, he is a murdered isn't he? How can there be anykind of a 'but' in murder? He killed him at a moment when his own life wasn't in danger. At the time the bullet was fired, there was no danger to the father.
 
#14
ken said:
no ifs and buts, he is a murdered isn't he? How can there be anykind of a 'but' in murder? He killed him at a moment when his own life wasn't in danger. At the time the bullet was fired, there was no danger to the father.
I know what you're saying & yeah the father's life was in no danger but his son's was. Maybe not at that moment but it had been previously, as had the cousin's, & would be again.

Like I said, 'punching & kicking' could result in 'not breathing'.

I highlight 'could' because I'm pretty sure that's what the father was thinking. If the bully had killed the boy & then the father went out & shot the bully I think a lot of people would be like, 'that's wrong but I can empathize'. All I'm saying is the father wasn't willing to take the chance & wait for that shit to happen.

And, IMO, there can be justifiable murders
 
#17
Vaudeville said:
read my whole post, and i never said it was ok that he killed him did i? read man
chill man, im just asking you questions to read what you got to say. I just want to see what people have got to say. you said 'he shouldnt have been a bully'. I asked 'but does that (bullying) justify murder of the individual?
 
#18
ken said:
thats the operative word 'opinion'
That's true man but, we know what I was saying was never factual, just my opinion.

Btw, do you have an opinion on my final answer of the father beating up the bully's father?

You appear to be against the use of violence but I do wonder what you thought of this...
 
#19
you advocated taken the law into your own hands a couple of times. First you said that the father (who killed) should have leathred the son, and then you said it would have been better if the bullies father was beaten up. Your opinion is very valid and you are allowe to have one.
Btw, do you have an opinion on my final answer of the father beating up the bully's father?
Thats collective guilt. Which is a fallacy no matter what way you look at it. Punishment of actions should be directed only at the one who is guilty not the one who is linked emotionally with the guilty party. Should the bullies father have been sent to priosn for the actions of his son.
Im not against violence per se. But I was wanting to see whether people believe if the law can be justifiably taken into your own hands, obviously this father felt very passionate about the situation. I haven't yet seen anybody say that he should have contacted the proper authorites. Democratic laws are in place because they are will of the majority and the enforcing of these laws can not be done by vigilantes. That would be a literal interpretation of the law, which I think is unworkable, we are not robots programmed to follow rules and algothithimc programming.

I think that the father was justified in seeking revenge, how he sought that is debateable, as long as it wasn't murder ( for certain reasons )
 
#20
ken said:
leathred the son
I'm not sure if there is one, but just incase there is a misunderstanding, those that were to get 'leathered' were the bully and/or the bully's father.

ken said:
Punishment of actions should be directed only at the one who is guilty not the one who is linked emotionally with the guilty party. Should the bullies father have been sent to priosn for the actions of his son.
I meant that the bully's father is responsible for his son & if the bully's father were to get his ass beat maybe he would keep his son in check a little better.(So as not to get beat up again)

As for the prison question, my answer is no, but I do believe that there are a bunch of crimes which parents are punished for in place of there child (who would be a minor), such as piracy & truanting, so it does happen.

ken said:
I haven't yet seen anybody say that he should have contacted the proper authorites.
I think complaining to the school was contacting the proper authorities. If you're talking police, well, schools usually say to go to them first, although if you are talking police, it appears the father went to school, skipped the police part & went straight to the next step.
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top