Assassinate Obama?

[Rukas]

With JFK it likely had to do with his political agenda

I hate being one of those fans that puts more weight on Tupac than necessary, but JFK died for the same reason Pac did. Both thought they were untouchable, both were wrong, and both paid for their mob/gang affiliations with their lives.

JFK had huge ties to the Italian Mafia (they helped get him elected with their control over the unions).

 

[Rukas]

I kind of get what Rahim is saying.

Who is more at danger, a Black man against a bunch of unorganized redneck racist hicks?

Or a white man, against pro-Black militant groups such as the Black Panthers?

I dont really think Obama has much to worry about, those redneck hicks hate women more than they do African Americans anyway.

This is probably a campaign tactic out of the Obama camp (although Im sure everyone is happy to have more protection) to make him appear more important and endangered. "Quick we better elect him before he gets killed" so to speak. If these evil people are trying to kill him, he must be trying to do something good right? Right?

 

[Preach]

To prove what I was trying to say, I have written out some questions for you all to think about. These questions are all in the same context of my points:


What is the sole purpose of a scare-tactic?

How can an assassination be used as a scare-tactic in a presidency election?

Do you have to be a black candidate while your running for presidency to be threatened by a scare-tactic?


Think about it. When your done answering, take a nap.

Why do you use questions to make your points lol? Why don't you just say what your point is.

The purpose of a scare-tactic is to scare someone. No one threatened to kill Obama, he just got extra security because the people who know shit figured it might be a good idea.

I don't know what you are getting at, but are you suggesting that they are trying to scare Obama to back out? Okay, fair point, I see it. Really. With Bush's Florida election I can buy that. But what does that have to do with the probability of a black presidential candidate getting assassinated compared to the same probability with a white presidential candidate? We are discussing whether or not there is a good reason for increasing his security, and there is, because he is black. It's a big change, it's revolutionary, it's new, it puts something in some people's blood. Black people have been held back for generations, and there is no reason to believe someone won't try to do the same this time around.

To answer your last question, no. You don't have to. Mathematically, there is a marginal probability that someone will shoot one of the white dudes instead. Realistically, I think everyone on this board except you will agree that him being black is a factor that distinguishes him from the other candidates, and singles him out as the only black person. Just looking at human cognitive studies, the fact that he sticks out from the bunch alone is reason enough. That's human biology.

I'll go take a nap now. Why don't you, for once, explain the points you try to convey in questions that make no sense so we know what you are actually trying to prove lol?

 

[Preach]

I hate being one of those fans that puts more weight on Tupac than necessary, but JFK died for the same reason Pac did. Both thought they were untouchable, both were wrong, and both paid for their mob/gang affiliations with their lives.

JFK had huge ties to the Italian Mafia (they helped get him elected with their control over the unions).

ya.

or the conspiracy theory. he got between the c.i.a. and the mob and the government killed him to shut him up.

 

[Chronic]

I kind of get what Rahim is saying.

Who is more at danger, a Black man against a bunch of unorganized redneck racist hicks?

Or a white man, against pro-Black militant groups such as the Black Panthers?

I dont really think Obama has much to worry about, those redneck hicks hate women more than they do African Americans anyway.

I don't think unorganized rednecks are the only racists in America.

Take a good look at the American History.

Rahim would you mind explaining what you meant by this? And please, no question to answer a question.

 

[Rukas]

I don't think unorganized rednecks are the only racists in America.

Of course not, but they are the only ones dumb enough to try something that the secret service could actually prevent; strong arm tactics.

The people that are the real threat will always have a way to get to Obama regardless if he has 10 body guards or a 100, as long as he makes public appearances.

In my opinion, his biggest threats are in the government, or shadow government, anyway. They killed Kennedy, they'll get to Obama if they want.

These security measures they are taking are to guard against those redneck hicks.

 

[Jokerman]

JFK died for the same reason Pac did.

That's right. A DeathRow chain.

 

[Jokerman]

The candidates running are all in the same boat.

That's right. The Titanic.

 

[Preach]

That's right. A DeathRow chain.

haven't you seen the new dvd? it was kevin hackie and suge man.

 

[Jokerman]

haven't you seen the new dvd? it was kevin hackie and suge man.

For JFK! Damn.

 

[Rahim]

Why don't you just say what your point is.

and look how that worked out.


alright to chronic and anyone else, refer to my other posts if your really interested in learning what i was saying, or trying to say at least,and maybe ull understand better........ cuz i dont want to debate anymore on this. i got my points across the way i wanted them to, if u didnt understand, well, too bad cuz i dont like xplaining over and over

edit: in other words, imbacking out because theres too many questions and its making me look deeper into my thoughts like its schoolwork....and its kinda boring now so yeah.......

 

[Preach]

what the fuck!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!?!?!?

alright to chronic and anyone else, refer to my other posts if your really interested in learning what i was saying, or trying to say at least,and maybe ull understand better........

no we won't. this is what we've been saying to you in all of this thread. what do you think we did refer to, other people's posts? you have posted several posts in this thread and we used those posts to get an idea of what you mean, all of us. none of us got it. maybe you need to explain better? when one person tells you something, you take it with a pinch of salt because they are just one person. when a collective of people tell you something, that's supposed to mean something.

cuz i dont want to debate anymore on this.

what do you mean by "more"? you haven't debated anything in this thread. there are no arguments being raised by you, and still, you just don't want to acknowledge ours.

i got my points across the way i wanted them to

then i'm gonna tell you an absolute truth - you have no points. your points involve asking stupid questions as responses to direct questions asked towards you to try and lure your way out of it or to seem important and intellectual. or to raise yourself above the rest of us, talking gibberish only you understand, yet acting like we're all idiots when we don't get it.

if u didnt understand, well, too bad cuz i dont like xplaining over and over

you never explained your points once, so in explaining them you wouldn't be repeating yourself, you would be breaking a vicious cycle that i'm starting to suspect you're not even aware of yourself.

edit: in other words, imbacking out because theres too many questions and its making me look deeper into my thoughts like its schoolwork....

if you only go this deep into your own opinions while in school, it's no wonder you can't debate. you don't seem to have opinions lol. c'mon. there aren't too many questions, there is one. what did you mean by your first post in which you said that the other candidates could just as well get assassinated and that this was likely a scare tactic? it probably wouldn't take you two paragraphs to explain so why do you keep dodging talking about it?

and its kinda boring now so yeah.......

all the threads you participate in will continue to be boring if you don't say what the fuck you mean lol. you can't throw some stupid shit out there, then when asked about it respond with a question, then change the subject and pull other factors and questions into the picture and expect us to take you seriously. you come off as inconsistent and clueless. at least say something direct, don't talk in poetic sentences and abstract words. just say what you want to say direct. for example "obama shouldnt worry. the other candidates could just as well get killed because <put your reason here>, and i think it's a scare tactic because <put reason here>".

 

[Preach]

and someone, please acknowledge what i'm saying so we can break this muff's illusionary confidence. i know i'm fucking right.

 

[Chronic]

I've never done this before but I'm closing this fucking thread because Rahim is pissing me the fuck off. You are the stupidest person I have ever encountered in my life and I honestly wish you bodily harm.

You make some vague as statements like "take a good look at American history" without bothering to explain what you mean OR you answer a question with a question. That is NOT explaing your point. Haven't you noticed that a lot of people tend not to understand what the fuck you mean? Take the hint and learn how to fucking discuss.

Thank God this is the internet because as soon as I post this my anger shall be gone and I'll no longer wish Rahim harm.