 |
|

11-03-2009, 06:08 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
OG
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 19,048
Thanks: 32
Thanked 192 Times in 131 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Killuminatii 71
I don't know. Why are you asking me this? I'm not a conspiracy nut, and i'm not running for office anytime soon lol. I simply stated that it was a good choice if he looked into it.
|
I guess I should ask why you think it's a good choice as opposed to just a choice. What good, specifically, do you see coming out of it? Not asking you to defend your statement, I just wanted to hear your reasons for adding "good choice". I'm curious since the subject has been popping up.
__________________
I'm tired of being pushed around like a stolen shopping cart full of rotten pumpkin meat!
|

11-03-2009, 11:49 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Denver
Posts: 6,026
Thanks: 113
Thanked 117 Times in 82 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ill-matic
Right.. it falls "far short of US expectations" yet they condone it.
Absolutely pathetic.
|
I'm sorry but what do you want to be done? Israel is like our little brother.
__________________
My Library Card Is All Scratched Up
|

11-03-2009, 01:36 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Anaheim, California
Posts: 1,260
Thanks: 152
Thanked 165 Times in 131 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chronic
I guess I should ask why you think it's a good choice as opposed to just a choice. What good, specifically, do you see coming out of it? Not asking you to defend your statement, I just wanted to hear your reasons for adding "good choice". I'm curious since the subject has been popping up.
|
I think it would be good for him to question the US government (which is obviously not completely honest with its own citizens), and hopefully he will raise more questions like the one had had on his first post. I would rather see Ill-matic do something different, rather than switch sides and keep following a political system that never changes its ways, has less influence on the President than Jewish lobbyists and wall street.
__________________
[Quote of the year] Miley Cyrus: "I dont know a Jay-Z Song. I dont listen to Pop Music."
Last edited by Killuminatii 71; 11-03-2009 at 01:39 PM.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Killuminatii 71 For This Useful Post:
|
|

11-03-2009, 03:25 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sunnydale
Posts: 3,311
Thanks: 41
Thanked 304 Times in 205 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ill-matic
Right.. it falls "far short of US expectations" yet they condone it.
|
Well, the freeze policy was Abbas's requirement for talks to begin, not so much Obama putting his foot down because he was morally outraged. All he wants is to get talks going to come up with a two-state settlement. If that happens, he knows this will be a moot point. Since Israel is going to ignore it his only choice is to overlook it. Because if he comes down hard on Israel, talks will definitely not happen. But he knows Abbas will give in before Israel does, just like he gave in. All he cares about is getting things going. He's just a politician doing what politicians do.
|

11-03-2009, 03:48 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,322
Thanks: 147
Thanked 305 Times in 184 Posts
|
|
|
^^ There's no logic in that. The entire foundation of a peace agreement lies in halting Israel's incursion into Palestianian territory. Palestinian civilians refer to Israel's incursion as "occupation", and it is precisely this which has fueled anti-Israel sentiment demonstrated by the increasing popularity of Hamas etc..
Peace talks cannot be productive if this continues to occur. That is my point. And further to that, it shows the weakness of Obama's administration to give into the desires Israel when they themselves said that ENDING the construction of settlements was a precondition for peace talks.
Again, these talks will go no where. This is all rhetoric on Israel's part, and their insistence on continuing the illegal construction of settlements ON PALESTINIAN TERRITORY simply demonstrates their unwillingness to cooperate and take these peace talks seriously.
Point is, they dont give a fuck. Will say "ohhh we will scale back our construction" just to show they are making some form of effort.. These talks will continue for a few months... Will go nowhere and will reach a stalemate...Someone will fire a rocket into the other, and then we will be back to square one... Just as we have been for the past few fucking decades, because an American administration doesn't have the balls to tell Israel to shut the fuck up and sit the fuck down.
__________________
Miss.. Butter Pecan caramel, southern bell
she hotter than a summer day in hell
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ill-matic For This Useful Post:
|
|

11-11-2009, 02:20 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the universe, where I'm not oppressed/controlled by any government or elitist society.
Posts: 389
Thanks: 36
Thanked 26 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
|
I see you trying to hide
Hoping that nobody don't notice
You must always remember you still a member of the hopeless
Wha, did that come out loud ? It was supposed to be in ma head.
Thanks for posting this Ill. Interesting read.
|

11-11-2009, 09:17 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
OG
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,115
Thanks: 251
Thanked 339 Times in 269 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ill-matic
^^ There's no logic in that. The entire foundation of a peace agreement lies in halting Israel's incursion into Palestianian territory. Palestinian civilians refer to Israel's incursion as "occupation", and it is precisely this which has fueled anti-Israel sentiment demonstrated by the increasing popularity of Hamas etc..
Peace talks cannot be productive if this continues to occur. That is my point. And further to that, it shows the weakness of Obama's administration to give into the desires Israel when they themselves said that ENDING the construction of settlements was a precondition for peace talks.
Again, these talks will go no where. This is all rhetoric on Israel's part, and their insistence on continuing the illegal construction of settlements ON PALESTINIAN TERRITORY simply demonstrates their unwillingness to cooperate and take these peace talks seriously.
Point is, they dont give a fuck. Will say "ohhh we will scale back our construction" just to show they are making some form of effort.. These talks will continue for a few months... Will go nowhere and will reach a stalemate...Someone will fire a rocket into the other, and then we will be back to square one... Just as we have been for the past few fucking decades, because an American administration doesn't have the balls to tell Israel to shut the fuck up and sit the fuck down.
|
I do agree, but you can't really blame Obama for that. You can put some blame on the entire administration, but there's more factors at work. The "Jewish lobby" (I hate that phrase because of it's conspiracy connotatios) IS very strong in the US and they're obviously trying to effect all they can when it comes to US policy dealing with Israel.
Would I want to see the US saying "enough is enough!" ? Yes, in a way. But I don't think that's practical. In the end, Obama is doing what Jokerman already said and what every politician would try, that's getting them all round the table again.
__________________
What?
This post and any/all of its contents does by no mean or form encourage the narcotic inhalation of goldfish.
|

11-11-2009, 09:34 AM
|
 |
Boom de yah dah!
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 9,195
Thanks: 398
Thanked 552 Times in 388 Posts
|
|
|
I blame the pikeys.
__________________
I put the lime in the coconut
Now what? ....
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|